personal loans Archives

New Rules for the Good of Consumers Says U.S. Consumer Agency

New Rules for the Good of Consumers Says U.S. Consumer Agency

It is vital that consumers should be able to find the right kind of lenders to have the perfect deal for their personal loans. The United States consumer protection agency has realized this importance and has found a way to make it easier for consumers to compare mortgage deals.

Mortgages come with different deals according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; these fees have different arrangements when it comes to the amount of promo points and fees you can have to reduce your loan’s interest rate. These deals are what make it very difficult for consumers to compare the loans of the different financial agencies.

In the proposed law of the U.S. consumer agency, the mortgage lenders could still offer the promos and fees to clients; however they must show the amount of the loan without the fees and the points.

According to Richard Cordray, director of the CFPB, they want to give customers the best and so it is a must that lenders should provide their deal and give the customer the option to easily choose their own loans.

The new rules that are expected to be followed next year exempt the provision in the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial oversight law. Debtors are allowed to have the decision in taking a mortgage without the fees and points that lenders offer with it.

Regulators are currently soliciting advice on how to make sure that customers will be able to fairly choose deal payments. The mortgage business has been criticized for approving loans for individuals who cannot afford them; this had a great contribution to the economic crisis of the country in 2007 to 2009.

The privilege of presenting and offering customers loans with unjust terms are often within the loan officers and brokers. Also, the qualifications and the standards for loans are different among individuals. The CFPB however, is confident that the new rules that they are proposing to adapt is going to take care of these problems.

Payday Loan House Bill for Pennsylvania

Payday Loan House Bill for Pennsylvania

According to CFPB, most loans are for hundreds of dollars and are charged with $15 or $20 for every $100 borrowed. Payday loans typically have a two-week term and fees amount to a percentage rate between 391 percent and 521 percent every year.

Depending on the state law, loan amounts and finance charges can differ. If the borrower fails repay the loan in full by the time the due date comes, then the lender is allowed by the loan agreement to cash the check of the borrower in order to get repayment.

There has been an increase in payday lenders across the country within the last two decades. Moreover, payday loans can now be availed online, with the arrival of new media.

According to the report from PBS during the month of May, almost 19 million US households use payday loans. According to industry analysts, this totals to $30 billion in short-term credit annually. While this is not yet a problem for Pennsylvania, it could be in the near future.

Philadelphia Daily News reported that Republican state Rep. Chris Ross sponsored a House bill that would introduce short-term lending to Pennsylvania, where it was originally forbidden. Ross believes that by doing so, a safer alternative will be offered to Pennsylvanians who currently take on loans from Internet companies that can resell their personal information.

According to John Rabenold, a lobbyist for payday lender Axcess Financial, the House bill is considered to be an opportunity for Pennsylvania residents that would provide jobs and cash for financial literacy programs. In addition, Rabenold said that he is aware there is a demand for short-term credit and there is also a supply for it, but he thinks that there is a cheaper and better way of service.

However, Diane Standaert, legislative counsel at the Center for Responsible Lending, opposes the legislation and said that it is a very bad idea.

Payday Lenders Have a Reason to Increase Rates

Payday Lenders Have a Reason to Increase Rates

Wonga, a payday lender from Britain has made public that they will be expanding their interest lending to small establishments. Though some consumer groups have been opposed to the gesture no one can say for sure that the move will be hazardous to small companies.

Paying interest just to borrow cash is an idea many people will be hesitant to do. Consumers and establishments are willing to pay rates lower than the charges Wonga is offering. A zero interest rate will be very appealing for everyone. However, lenders such as Wonga charge these high interest rates to prevent bad debt expenses.

When payday shops lend money to individuals who may be unlikely to pay off their loans they have to consider the chances that the borrowers may not be able to pay back what they owe. If you think about it is practical for payday lenders to increase their rates for risky borrowers because if they fail to pay the payday shop will suffer. Most of the small companies that apply for a loan in Wonga have high default rates for their loans. The small companies will have to borrow money because if they do not they will die off anyway.

If the small businesses are not allowed to borrow money, their owners will apply for personal loans anyway and will be signing in their business property in the contract; basically it is the same thing.

Government policies should be centered on protecting consumers from negative forces in the environment, not trying to block payday lending to small companies. High interest loans are not negative forces, small businesses do not harm the environment and they do not usually contribute to the worse kinds of pollution. They only belong to individuals who want to engage in the industry.

Preventing lending to these establishments is like killing the dreams of their owners. Also, the prevention of lending to the businesses will be expensive for the government because it would require them to enforce bans which mean more money to spend on forces.

Personal Loan Rates Drop But Not Entirely

Personal Loan Rates Drop But Not Entirely

Personal loan rates have been declining these past few months and this is making personal loans cheaper for clients. However, if you spend on a credit card you can get rid of the interest too.

Interest rates pertaining to personal loans are fluctuating more often nowadays. The changes are leaning in favor to customers making the loan cheaper and more affordable now.

Two well-known suppliers of these loans are Sainsbury’s Finance and Derbyshire Building Society and they have announced to the public that there have been changes in their rates, now they offer 5.9% for people who are borrowing a minimal amount of £7,500 in an interval of three years or longer.

Sainsbury offers to drop this 5.8 percent rate if a customer chooses to pay the loan before a three year period, and according to, this has been the lowest record of personal rates since November of 2006.

Good news for those who wish to borrow £7,500, the amount is now available for an interest rate of 6% or maybe even less! If you borrow this amount with a 6% interest you will only have to repay £228.16 of £8,213 during the period, which basically means that the loan will only require £713.92 in the interest charges.

But if you wish to borrow a smaller amount like £3,000 the rates would be higher. Sainsbury will have to impose a 14.8 percent rate which is almost twice as big over a three year period loan, costing you interest charges of about £733.29.

If you want to borrow only a small amount then you can get rid of interest rates by taking advantage of a 0% purchase card. This requires no interest rates provided you pay the whole amount in 18 months.

If you have great credit then you can get a loan for small amounts in NatWest and RBS with their YourPoints World MasterCard Special Offer cards. These credit card deals have to offer.

Judge Fails the U.S. Government’s Student Aid Loan Standard

Judge Fails the U.S. Government’s Student Aid Loan Standard

Just a few days ago, the Education Department announced that for-profit students who are loaning are having extreme difficulties in paying back their federal loans. And a federal judge has given a reason as to why that is so: he says that the measure of prepayments is of failing standard.

United States District Judge Mr. Rudolph Contreras based in Washington believes that the minimum loan standard of the government in their repayments of 35 percent is subjective and illogical.The statement of the judge was given as a reply to a lawsuit of national association of for-profit colleges which has a member of 47 schools across Minnesota; the association is gravely against the “gainful employment” test.

This three-pronged test’s main purpose is to make certain that for-profit college students would be able to get work which the salary is enough to pay off the college loan they have.The government is now threatening to take away the loans from the for-profit college if they fail to comply with the guidelines. A billion dollars is on the line for these schools every year, this money includes most of the income of private companies and are operating for these for-profit colleges.

The ruling of Judge Contreras highlighted two elements of the test that was the standard of measuring the loan payments of the applicants in relation to their total and subsidiary income. According to the law, individuals should not pay more than 12 percent of the total accumulated earnings or an amount above their 30 percent discretionary income. But both of these were connected to the repayment test and Judge Contreras felt it was only right to cast them off.

This loan standard was brought up for the reason that for-profit colleges are more expensive than public colleges and they have higher student loan default rates than other colleges. Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities better known as the APSCU has claimed victory over their case. According to their president Steve Gunderson, the only alternate action acceptable for these colleges is to have a single definition for their educational instruction.

 Page 1 of 59  1  2  3  4  5 » ...  Last »